The first youth grammar interclass debate competition of college of humanities and law was successfully held at the beginning, the secondand the semi-finals

In order to promote the construction of learning style of our college,train students' logical thinking and language expression ability,activate the humanistic atmosphere of our college, and strengthen the study and communication among students, our college held the firstinterclass debate competition for young grammarian students in May,2018.

On May 10, the competition officially kicked off, and the classes of2018 undergraduate students of our college sent out excellent playersto actively respond to the competition. No matter is the experienced debate team member, or the debate resume is almost zero novice, theyall in this "friendship for the" debate competition has demonstrated the extraordinary strength and the outstanding aura. Atthe end of the fierce preliminary competition, the classes that wonthe entrance tickets for the rematch were: class 1, class 3, class 4,class 7, class 9, class 4, Chinese language and literature, and class1, philosophy.

Duringthe contest, the debaters were incisively and sharply worded

The teams took a group photo

After the exciting preliminary and semi-final, a total of four team ssuccessfully stood out, they are: 18 law class 1, 18 law class 4, 18law class 7 and 18 philosophy class 1. In the end, our two top teams were selected in the semifinals, they were class 1 in law and class 1in philosophy of grade 18 respectively. Hope that the final team cancontinue to march forward, in the final level of competition,competition style, competition wonderful.

Semifinal scene

Attached debate:

Preliminary:

Intoday's China, higher education should adhere to the principle of"easy in, easy out"

Thesemi:

1.Who is more suitable to be a husband, wukong or sha seng? (law class7 vs law class 9)

2.When you can't have both love and marriage, which one should youchoose? (Chinese language and literature class 4 vs law class 4)

3.Is distance the stumbling block to love (law class 9 vs law class 1)

The semi-final:

1.Which is more pathetic: never owning or dying (philosophy 1 vs law 4)

2.Put an end to piracy, which should play a more important role,consumers or the government (law class 1 vs law class 7)

Author:None From:school ofhumanities and law